Category: Issues

  • The National Academies’ Gene Drive study has ignored important and obvious issues

    The National Academies’ Gene Drive study has ignored important and obvious issues

    by Jim Thomas (The Guardian): ‘Gene drives’ seem to be the ultimate high-leverage technology. Yesterday’s report from the US National Academies begun the job of describing what is at stake, but it missed some important questions. If there is a prize for the fastest emerging tech controversy of the century the ‘gene drive’ may have […]

  • Permanently changing a species: What could go wrong?

    by Dana Perls, Food and Technology campaigner (Friends of the Earth US) No commercial or environmental release of gene drives, says Friends of the Earth The National Academies of Sciences released a new report today, which calls for robust safety assessments for “gene drive modified organisms.” The NAS says the controversial new genetic engineering technology […]

  • Mascoma: The biggest misspending of public funds for cellulosic biofuels ever?

    This is an investigation of Mascoma Corporation, a start-up biofuels company which may have misspent more public funds intended for building advanced biofuels refineries than any other company in North America. Download the investigation Summary: Mascoma took at least $100m and possibly over $155m in public funding intended for building integrated biorefineries. Their biggest donor […]

  • U.S. tries to export its biotech deregulatory regime

    U.S. tries to export its biotech deregulatory regime

    by Dr. Steve Suppan (Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy) A long standing claim by the U.S. government and agribusiness lobby is that U.S. regulations on genetically engineered (GE) crops are science-based while European regulations are not.  For example, an April 8 letter from the American Soybean Association to the U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman […]

  • “Contained” industrial use of GE microbes: A regulatory loophole large enough for most commercial synthetic biology uses to fit through

    “Contained” industrial use of GE microbes: A regulatory loophole large enough for most commercial synthetic biology uses to fit through

    by Almuth Ernsting (ECO Volume 52, Issue 2) The vast majority of current synthetic biology applications involve microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi (e.g. yeast) and microalgae. Nearly all uses of genetically engineered (GE) microorganisms are classed as ‘contained’, a term which, under different countries’ and regions’ regulations covers all uses inside industrial facilities, such as biofuel […]

  • God’s Red Pencil? CRISPR and The Three Myths of Precise Genome Editing

    God’s Red Pencil? CRISPR and The Three Myths of Precise Genome Editing

    by Jonathan Latham, PhD (Independent Science News) For the benefit of those parts of the world where public acceptance of biotechnology is incomplete, a public relations blitz is at full tilt. It concerns an emerging set of methods for altering the DNA of living organisms. “Easy DNA Editing Will Remake the World. Buckle Up“; “We […]

  • Precautionary approach to synthetic  biology needs to be translated into  effective regulation

    Precautionary approach to synthetic biology needs to be translated into effective regulation

    by Almuth Ernsting ([square brackets]) The Ad-hoc Technical Expert Group (AHTEG) on Synthetic Biology [1] reaffirmed the need to observe the precautionary approach in relation to synthetic biology. Its report lists 15 potential adverse impacts of synthetic biology and emphasises the need for comprehensive case-by-case risk assessments. Disappointingly, no agreement could be reached as to […]

  • Synthetic biology: A continuing  challenge for the CBD

    Synthetic biology: A continuing challenge for the CBD

    by Helena Paul and Silvia Ribeiro ([square brackets]) The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) pioneered the discussion on synthetic biology at the global level, with the vast majority of countries asking for the full application of precaution. Following the decisions taken at the twelfth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP 12) to the […]

  • New GMOs are ‘not GM’ – EU folds under US pressure

    New GMOs are ‘not GM’ – EU folds under US pressure

    by Oliver Tickell (the Ecologist) The EU Commission has caved in to US pressure in TTIP trade talks by deciding to consider organisms modified by new ‘gene editing’ techniques as non-GM – in violation of the EU’s own laws. The move could make the ‘new GMOs’ exempt from labeling and from health and environmental testing. […]

  • Who Approved the Genetically Engineered Foods Coming to Your Plate? No One.

    Who Approved the Genetically Engineered Foods Coming to Your Plate? No One.

    by Mike Orcutt (MIT Technology Review) The debate over genetically modified foods is about to get a lot more heated in Washington, D.C. DuPont Pioneer’s new waxy corn hybrid and a Penn State plant scientist’s “anti-browning” white button mushroom are the latest additions to a fast-growing pile of new genetically engineered crops that have so […]